Pull Request Conventions
This is a guide for conducting effective and efficient pull requests in our code projects and applies to all github sources.
In general, a pull request (PR) should communicate what the change is, and why it’s necessary.
Pull requests should be created from personal forks. We follow a fork-rebase workflow.
- For a single commit, the title is the subject line of the commit message.
- Otherwise, the title should summarise the set of commits.
- Must state the why and the how for the change.
- Usually this is the body of your commit message.
- Must explain the purpose of the PR, e.g.:
- feedback for an initial implementation,
- request for comment,
- ready to merge.
- Explain any context:
- is it part of a greater set of changes?
- are any concurrent PRs (in other repositories) dependent on this PR?
- State what testing has been performed:
- Run sel4test and for which platforms.
- The TSC of the seL4 foundation will delegate reviewers to approve. Anyone can help to review a pull request.
- If you want a particular person to review, please tag them.
- If there hasn’t been any activity after a couple of days, feel free to bump the post.
- Pull requests require at least one approving review for merge, and usually should aim for 2 reviews on each non-trivial pull request.
- Commit history is part of the review
- A good commit history assists reviewers in understanding the change
- Please see the Git conventions.
- Good reviews are small reviews. Large PRs should only be created if necessary.
- The foundation repositories require the following tests to pass
before a pull request can be merged:
- code style
- these may vary per repository and language, but default should standardise on those in the repository seL4/seL4_tools
- developer certificate of origin (DCO)
- checks for SPDX license tagging (using the REUSE tool)
- any applicable regression tests:
- these vary per repository
- for seL4 itself, they must include:
- compile test
- hardware and/or simulator runs
- the proofs
- for verification target repositories (currently mainly seL4):
- a pull request can only be merged on the master branch if either the corresponding proof is updated or if there is no proof impact.
- there is no proof impact if:
- the preprocessed source for verified code has not changed (this is tested by the “preprocess” check on GitHub), or
- the proof still works unchanged despite the code change
(please ping the
@verificationteam on the GitHub seL4 org when the “preprocess” check fails and you think the proof might still work).
- for proof updates:
- submit a pull request to the
l4vrepository together with the pull request for the
- ping the
@verificationteam on the GitHub seL4 org for help in updating the proofs, or
- talk to the seL4 Foundation about finding funding and/or volunteers for the proofs updates if it is a bigger project.
- submit a pull request to the
- code style
- Exceptions are possible by approval of someone in the Committer role
During a PR
- Always abide by the seL4 Code of Conduct.
- Take into account the context stated by the author.
- Review commits and commit messages as well as code
- Request that the above guide be followed if it is not.
- Provide constructive feedback.
- see the resources below.
- Remember to comment on good things.
- Apply changes due to feedback from reviewers as additional commits, and squash them once the PR is ready to merge.
- Please attempt to only push changes to the PR branch once it is ready for re-review.
- Please communicate any changes you make during the review process.
- Apart from editing history, or fixing trivial issues, do not push changes to a PR once it has been approved.
Anyone in the Committer role can merge pull requests after they satisfy the required tests and approvals.
Currently, for many repositories in the seL4 GitHub org, the Trustworthy Systems (TS) group still provides continuous integration (CI) infrastructure on their internal servers. For these repositories, someone from TS will merge the pull request on that internal infrastructure, and it will be pushed out to GitHub automatically by the CI pipeline. Some of these tests, especially those involving proofs may run for multiple hours, some more than 24h, so it might take some time for the merge to become visible.
You can recognise these repositories by the fact that they require 6 (instead of 1) approving reviews for pull requests – this is merely a mechanism to prevent accidental merges.
The seL4 foundation is working on making this CI infrastructure more accessible directly on GitHub to avoid this additional step, but it will require some time and resources to do so. If you’re interested in helping with this, please email the TSC chair.
As long as the CI infrastructure is hosted by TS, some pull requests will continue to be handled directly internally on the TS group’s infrastructure. The TS group must abide by the same rules for these as outlined above.